Problem on serial communication with Lazarus (free pascal) Arduino Forum > Using Arduino > Interfacing w/ Software on. I located also this component to establish the serial communication between arduino and lazarus. I tried to increase the bauds rate on the serial port communication to 115200 bauds and now there is partially solved the. Start studying Computing from past papers. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Log in Sign up. Log in Sign up. Computing from past papers. The internal components of a computer system are connected together by three buses. 1 (a) State the name of the only. According to one described embodiment, a method is provided in which transaction information is determined. The transaction information is associated with (i) a buyer who has arranged to purchase a product from a central controller at a first price established between the buyer and the central controller and (ii) a merchant that offers the product for sale at a second price, different from the first price, without offering the product for sale to buyers at the first price. Information is transmitted that facilitates the acquisition of the product by the buyer, in exchange for payment provided by the buyer to the central controller. An amount based on the second price is provided to the merchant. CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is a divisional of U.S. Patent application Ser. 09/540,035, filed Mar. 31, 2000 entitled “Retail System For Selling Products Based On A Flexible Description”. Patent application Ser. 09/540,035 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/165,435, filed Nov. 15, 1999 entitled “Uniseller Internet Pricing”. Mystery case files prime suspects walkthrough gem box. Patent application Ser. 09/540,035 is also a continuation-in-part for each of the following U.S. Patent applications: • • (i) U.S. Patent application Ser. 08/889,503, filed Jul. ![]() 8, 1997 and issued as U.S. 6,249,772 on Jun. 19, 2001 entitled “Systems and Methods Wherein a Buyer Purchases a Product at a First Price and Acquires the Product from a Merchant that Offers the Product for Sale at a Second Price”; • (ii) U.S. Patent application Ser. 08/997,170, filed Dec. 22, 1997 and issued as U.S. 6,356,878 on Mar. 12, 2002 entitled “Conditional Purchase Offer Buyer Agency System”; • (iii) U.S. Download mod ninja saga offline. Patent application Ser. 09/220,191, filed Dec. 23, 1998 and issued as U.S. 7,386,508 on Jun. 10, 2008 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Facilitating a Transaction Between a Buyer and One Seller”; • (iv) U.S. Patent application Ser. 09/337,906, filed Jun. 22, 1999 and issued as U.S. 6,754,636 on Jun. 22, 2004 entitled “Purchasing Systems and Methods Wherein a Buyer Takes Possession at a Retailer of a Product Purchased Using a Communication Network”; • (v) U.S. Patent application Ser. 09/359,265, filed Jul. 22, 1999 entitled “System and Method for Facilitating and Managing the Sale of Customized Travel Product Restrictions”; and • (vi) U.S. Patent application Ser. 09/388,723, filed Sep. 2, 1999 and now abandoned entitled “Purchasing Systems and Methods Wherein a Buyer Takes Possession at a Retailer of a Product Purchased Using a Communication Network”. Each of the above-referenced applications is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to systems for selling products to customers. More specifically, the present invention relates to a system for selling a product to a customer based on a flexible product description provided by the customer. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION According to conventional retail pricing systems, a particular product is offered to all potential customers for a single price. Therefore, a conventional retailer endeavors to determine an “optimal” single price for a product that will generate more profit than any other single price. Shortcomings exist even if a conventional retailer succeeds in determining an “optimal” price. Specifically, profit generated by sales at an “optimal” price will likely be less than a theoretical maximum profit, because some customers will be willing to pay more than the “optimal” price for the product. In this regard, the theoretical maximum profit is a profit resulting from charging each customer a maximum price he is willing to pay. Profit may also fall short of the theoretical maximum because no profit will be obtained from potential customers who are willing to pay more than the retailer's cost for the product but are unwilling to pay the “optimal” price. Due to these and other shortcomings, retailers have experimented with alternative pricing systems intended to generate a profit closer to the theoretical maximum. Individualized bargaining is one such alternative system. In individualized bargaining, a retailer or a retailer's agent individually negotiates with each potential customer in an attempt to extract a highest price from each customer. However, associated transaction costs incurred by the retailer increase in proportion to the number of transactions. Accordingly, individualized bargaining is not desirable for retailers having more than a few customers, since the associated transaction costs would outweigh any resulting increase in profit from sales. In view of the foregoing, what is needed is a pricing system for increasing a retailer's profit without incurring unacceptable transaction costs. Improvements are also needed in other types of conventional pricing systems. For instance, conventional systems for discounting prices create several problems for retailers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |